Thoughts on Lance Armstrong

source: http://www.zimbio.com/Lance+Armstrong/articles/kisLHTVNqf5/Lance+Armstrong+Banned+Cycling+Stripped+7

I’m going to come right out and say that I disagree with the USADA’s lengthy battle against Lance Armstrong and I disagree with his titles being stripped.

Do I think Lance Armstrong was completely clean? Not at all. But the USADA never caught him. No one ever caught him. In my opinion, his statement on the matter implies as much “The bottom line is I played by the rules that were put in place by the UCI, WADA and USADA when I raced” by including the words “when I raced”. But the USADA has spent decades, close to a decade longer than their own rules allow, hunting the guy despite never having a dirty sample while he raced. If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck…then it’s a duck, or in this case a witch hunt.

Do I think he’s a super great guy? No. Do I think his foundation is great, yes but I think that’s because he has amazing people running it. I think his name does a lot for cancer and I think you’d be hard pressed to find someone who doesn’t agree with that. I also think he’s a super competitive guy who did what he had to do to win. And it seems, based on the fact that his tests were clean at the time, what he did to win was acceptable.

Do I think the USADA even has the authority to require his titles to be stripped? No. I understand where they’re drawing their authority, that the USPS was a team sponsor and therefore it’s a government matter in their opinion. But cycling is an international sport and the US didn’t award his Tour de France titles. I do understand that the UCI is a signer of the World Anti Doping Code, but if they don’t recognize the USADA’s assertion that a lack of a fight implies admission of guilt then why should they strip the titles? Look, looking past what I think is a gross waste of resources by the USADA, they’re not the end all be all of authority. I read an interesting article about the recent NCAA sanctions against Penn State and the author, who was confused by the NCAA’s authority to impose said sanctions, said something along the lines of “There’s a reason that the IRS isn’t out looking for murderers in their spare time. It’s not their jurisdiction” (quote grossly paraphrased and reworded by me). I hope the UCI, who has sided with Armstrong during the investigations, puts up a fight regarding the titles.

I genuinely welcome your respectful thoughts on the matter. Admittedly, I’m not knowledgeable about the history of cycling but I have, for years, said that I think this is a witch hunt and I feel the way this ended supports that opinion.

 

10 Responses to Thoughts on Lance Armstrong
  1. Heather
    August 24, 2012 | 10:53 am

    honestly I don’t watch the news and haven’t been following the story. He always seemed a bit shady to me but do agree his foundation does great things.
    Heather recently posted..HLS 2012: Chobani Dinner at EvooMy Profile

  2. AmyC
    August 24, 2012 | 11:48 am

    It really has seemed like a witch hunt and although I also think he may have “gotten away” with it, I don’t blame him for walking away from a one-sided fight.
    AmyC recently posted..Fitness Friday: Playing TagMy Profile

  3. Gwen
    August 24, 2012 | 1:25 pm

    I really agree with you. I don’t think he should be stripped of all his titles.
    Gwen recently posted..The GwenniePie 500My Profile

  4. Christine @ Love, Life, Surf
    August 24, 2012 | 2:00 pm

    I completely agree with you Carly. I don’t think that he’s totally clean or a great guy either but they never caught him under while he was racing or during the time allowed for investigation. Plus, everyone else was doping at the time too so by stripping him of his titles and giving it to the 2nd place finisher necessary guarantee that that rider was clean?

    But, his Tour de France victories helped raise the profile of cycling and his foundation is doing great work on cancer. I don’t know. Will be interesting to see the fall-out.
    Christine @ Love, Life, Surf recently posted..Excuses {Guest Post}My Profile

  5. KymberlyFunFit
    August 24, 2012 | 2:18 pm

    I don’t yet know enough to form a decision, though I will say that trying a person in public is not a fair approach. Lance’s decision to move on and not devote more time to fighting the charges does not necessarily mean guilt. It could mean maturity and wanting to spend time elsewhere. I am curious how this will play out.
    KymberlyFunFit recently posted..Want to Be Enchanting?: 4 Tips, Part 1My Profile

  6. Fancy Nancy
    August 24, 2012 | 3:05 pm

    I agree with you…they didn’t catch him and therefore should not be able to strip ALL his titles from him! I’m not convinced that he didn’t cheat but how can they go back so many years and assume it was going on then?
    Fancy Nancy recently posted..What’s in my gym bag?My Profile

  7. Pavement Runner
    August 24, 2012 | 4:58 pm

    you make some good points. I don’t think anyone in the sport was clean during that time period. If you go down the list of finishers (after lance) in those years, you get to 3rd, 6th, 8th place before you find someone that hasn’t been accused or proven to be dirty.

    Tough to believe that this one man was clean and beat all the other “dirty” cyclists.

    He has accomplished a lot on the bike and for cancer. Sad.
    Pavement Runner recently posted..How My Run Turned #MezamashiiMy Profile

  8. [...] Thoughts on Lance Armstrong (carlybananas.com) Share this:EmailFacebookStumbleUpon Posted by Robyn M. Ryan on Aug 25, 2012 [...]

  9. Alberto Peyton
    August 25, 2012 | 7:36 am

    I am a fan of Lance Armstrong because he is the great cyclist.I wish he will fully cured of his disease of cancer. Thanks for your well post.
    Alberto Peyton recently posted..maxworkoutsreviewed.netMy Profile

  10. Jimmy
    August 31, 2012 | 9:07 am

    How did he exactly beat cancer? I never read the book.

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

CommentLuv badge

Trackback URL http://carlybananas.com/2012/08/24/thoughts-on-lance-armstrong/trackback/